data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0e71/f0e7123ca26ccd889e77fc3b356b5ed2bc9b59b1" alt=""
Why don't they combine wind & solar power by putting solar panels on wind mills?
Thursday, March 31, 2005 | 1 Comments
Wednesday, March 30, 2005 | 0 Comments
Tuesday, March 29, 2005 | 1 Comments
This post has been removed by a blog administrator.
March 29, 2005 3:52 PM
Just discovered your blog(s) - I really like them, but I can't figure out what the difference is between the three...
March 29, 2005 3:52 PM
Well, here in the Deep South kids get their first bb gun at 6, a 20 gauge shotgun at 10, a hunting rifle (.30.30, etc) at 12 or 14. The thinking is, if you start them out young, they learn the proper way to handle them, and there is no mystery so they aren't inclined to mess with them improperly. My 13 yr old has been shooting since he was 7, and I am confident he can handle himself. It all depends on the kid, I guess. There are some adult who shouldn't be allowed to handle guns, and some children who have enough maturity to be able to go hunting on their own.
March 29, 2005 4:07 PM
Start 'em out young...would that work with pornography too? Maybe cut down on teen pregnancies?
And speaking of limits on firearms, what's with this "waiting period" before you can buy a gun? I'm angry now, damn it!
March 29, 2005 9:53 PM
Scott: This blog is just my random topic blog, Renegade Mouth is my blog about interesting quotes, and Sylvana Finds is a blog review blog (it only has blogs that I have found to be consistently interesting).
Rootietoot: Like the Mongolians and horsemanship, right? Where I come form they try the "start them young" thing with drinking- but we still drink ike crazy when we hit 16. I do agree that if children are taught to respect guns they are far less likely to do something stupid with them. So I say NO TOY GUNS! Too much of a mixed message.
sideshow bob: I too totally agree with waiting periods. The only reason you could be in a hurry to get a gun would be to do no good.
March 29, 2005 11:58 PM
Monday, March 28, 2005 | 0 Comments
ugh. I never heard about the baby thing. that's awful.
Bush is an ass, no way about it. His arguments that we're supposed to "err on the side of life" is total bullshit, as he proved over and over again as governor of texas.
thanks for stopping by - glad it made you laugh!
March 28, 2005 8:09 PM
Sunday, March 27, 2005 | 0 Comments
Thursday, March 24, 2005 | 0 Comments
Wednesday, March 23, 2005 | 0 Comments
In these troubling times there are many uncertainties and few unquestioned truths. Rampant confusion plagues the minds of the nervous masses. Order begets chaos in true entropic fashion. As individuals we are powerless to stand against the madness but united we may prevail. We are soldiers; armed with the shield of awareness and the sword of willpower, we stand ready for battle. When all is at an end and the hearts of men are failing them, we will emerge triumphantly and proclaim the new day! There is simply no time for trepidation or anxiety. It saddens me to say that the cowardly, the craven, and the timorous among us are assured an ill fate. We must act swiftly with the time we are given if we are to gain hope for ourselves. Learn more about the madness at www.freewebs.com/orangewrists or at orangewrists.blogspot.com.
March 23, 2005 10:02 PM
After reading the above comment I'm thinking maybe it's LSD not Valium. Maybe chased by a little "Jonestown Punch"? Hmmm...
March 24, 2005 11:34 AM
Wednesday, March 23, 2005 | 0 Comments
Sunday, March 20, 2005 | 0 Comments
I had an interesting experience with the word "Bubbler." I was born in Milwaukee, and my entire family (from the Neenah-Menasha area) called water fountains "Bubblers." When I moved to Las Vegas as a child, I attempted to use the term with some random casino worker (as in "where's the bubbler? It's 300 degrees outside, and I need some water!" After the strange, almost aggressive reaction, I received, I quickly understood "Bubbler" was a Wisconsin-only (possibly my-family-only) thing.
March 21, 2005 6:36 PM
I am from South Dakota and we call it pop here. The big fight when I was in college was that the South Dakotans ate casseroles and the Minnesotans ate hot dishes. And the SD's played duck duck goose, while the crazy MN's played grey duck....
March 23, 2005 11:29 AM
Upon moving from the East coast to California (at the age of eight), my troubles arose when I told my new-found friends I had to go in for "supper." (Pronounced suppa)
Although still in California, I've recently moved to the foothills of the Sierra. I was truly surprised to find the locals really do call our non-local visitors "Flatlanders."
March 24, 2005 3:22 PM
Yup, in Texas it's a "coke". You order your coke, then the waitress asks "Diet or regular, is Pepsi ok?"? It's a thing. A beloved, lovely Texas thang.
March 30, 2005 6:20 AM
Soda! It's called soda! Cokes okay. Maybe the people just got mixed up and stuck with what they originaly called it. But pop... people please, pop is more cheesy than...(looks at dictionary) a empty box that you pay 80$ for and your expecting a Game Boy SP... that sort of burns me up.
May 02, 2005 10:46 PM
Tuesday, March 15, 2005 | 0 Comments
Monday, March 14, 2005 | 0 Comments
Monday, March 14, 2005 | 0 Comments
Friday, March 11, 2005 | 0 Comments
Thursday, March 10, 2005 | 0 Comments
Wednesday, March 09, 2005 | 0 Comments
funny! you never think of those things when you are from a non-vacation state such as wisconsin!
March 09, 2005 10:19 PM
That would be just my luck that.Win a vacation to somewhere i live.
June
March 11, 2005 10:55 AM
I went to Hawaii. That would be funny if you got a prize that included Hawaii. Though you do sort of get a spa, a ride home, etc., etc., etc.
May 02, 2005 10:50 PM
Monday, March 07, 2005 | 0 Comments
That was funny.Ive never fired one up in the store.I usually just look around to make sure i dont know anyone then try and get it out with out anyone recognising me.The thought of one of my neighbours coming in and me stood there with the sales person firing it up for me.Sooo embarrassing.
June
March 08, 2005 9:19 AM
Sunday, March 06, 2005 | 0 Comments
They are always the ones who have plenty of money but never spend it.Like the ones that when you go to the restaurant have always left their wallet in their other purse or in the house.Then swear they will pay you back.which turns out to be sometime never.
March 07, 2005 8:44 AM
Sunday, March 06, 2005 | 0 Comments
Tuesday, March 01, 2005 | 0 Comments
I watched that movie when it was in the theatres and after reading your review and looking forward to revisiting it.I really enjoyed it the first time round as well.
June
March 04, 2005 9:08 AM
Tuesday, March 01, 2005 | 0 Comments
Totally gross lol
March 01, 2005 1:41 PM
Tuesday, March 01, 2005 | 0 Comments
Copyright © 2008 Syllogism. All Rights Reserved.
Design by Padd IT Solutions - Blogger Notes Template by Blogger Templates
because they would be too wonderful.
everyone would just stare
and stare
and stare
...
(thx for stopping by e.c.t.a.2.a.m. by the way)
March 31, 2005 11:00 PM
maybe it's some strange physics thing, like the wind moves in the opposite direction of the sun due to heat convection.
or something.
April 01, 2005 2:23 PM
Uhh... yeah... a "strange physics thing"...
Because solar panels have to face UP, and wind turbines have to face horizontally!!
April 03, 2005 7:21 AM
This post has been removed by a blog administrator.
April 03, 2005 1:16 PM
I have seen solar panels on the flat side of buildings before, so I'm not so sure if they have to be facing up, probably better if they do. But that's still OK because the blades of the turbines do face up at an angle to catch the wind, at least those newer ones that I have seen.
April 03, 2005 1:39 PM
ok, fine... how's this...
Wind turbine blades = thin and light
Solar panels = wide and heavy
April 03, 2005 7:45 PM
Yeah, that's a very good argument too Dave, but I have seen solar powered roof shingles that are the same size and thickness as roofing shingles, and said to be flexible and lightweight. I think that if they can make solar-powered roofing shingles they should be able to shingle wind turbines.
April 03, 2005 9:18 PM
I'll try this one more time.
THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO REASON TO PUT SOLAR PANELS ON A WINDMILL!!!
:)
April 03, 2005 10:38 PM
You're probably right, Dave. I guess it is just the German in me striving for ultimate efficiency.
April 03, 2005 11:03 PM
damn, dave, let me say this definitively: you do not have a poet's soul.
there's no call to go getting all empirical about this stuff.
just think, man. shiny. spinning.
[checks watch.]
uh oh. it's past the time when I'm allowed to leave comments in other people's blogs b/c I get unpredictable. better go...
April 06, 2005 2:16 AM
Hmm... sound more effitient than self-recording tapes.
May 02, 2005 10:28 PM